Contre les défenses du présentisme par le sens commun

Igitur 9 (1):1-24 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
According to presentism, only the present exists. The view is in a bad dialectical situation since it has to face several objections based on physics and a priori arguments. The view remains nonetheless popular because it is, allegedly, more intuitive than alternative views, namely eternalism (past, present and future entities exist) and no-futurism (only past and present entities exist). In the essay, I shall not discuss whether intuitivity is an accurate criterion for ontological enquiry. I will rather argue that any philosophically acceptable version of presentism entails highly counterintuitive consequences. Indeed, the presentist has to commit herself to substantial claims in order to provide an answer to two problems : the grounding problem and the cross-temporal relations problem. Therefore, if the main motivation for presentism is the willingness to stick with common sense intuitions, presentists should consider endorsing another view about existence in time.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2017-12-29
Latest version: 2 (2018-01-03)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
256 ( #30,772 of 72,532 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
39 ( #21,809 of 72,532 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.