Contre les défenses du présentisme par le sens commun

Igitur 9 (1):1-24 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
According to presentism, only the present exists. The view is in a bad dialectical situation since it has to face several objections based on physics and a priori arguments. The view remains nonetheless popular because it is, allegedly, more intuitive than alternative views, namely eternalism (past, present and future entities exist) and no-futurism (only past and present entities exist). In the essay, I shall not discuss whether intuitivity is an accurate criterion for ontological enquiry. I will rather argue that any philosophically acceptable version of presentism entails highly counterintuitive consequences. Indeed, the presentist has to commit herself to substantial claims in order to provide an answer to two problems : the grounding problem and the cross-temporal relations problem. Therefore, if the main motivation for presentism is the willingness to stick with common sense intuitions, presentists should consider endorsing another view about existence in time.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LEBCLD
Revision history
First archival date: 2017-12-29
Latest version: 2 (2018-01-03)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality.Correia, Fabrice & Schnieder, Benjamin (eds.)

View all 44 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
L'éternité sans le temps.Le Bihan, Baptiste
Qu'est-ce que le temps ?Le Bihan, Baptiste

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-12-29

Total views
90 ( #34,657 of 49,996 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #38,470 of 49,996 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.