Explaining away temporal flow – thoughts on Prosser’s ‘Experiencing Time’

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I offer some responses to Prosser’s ‘Experiencing Time’, one of whose goals is to debunk a view of temporal experience somewhat prevalent in the metaphysics literature, which I call ‘Perceptualism’. According to Perceptualism: it is part of the content of perceptual experience that time passes in a metaphysically strong sense: the present has a metaphysically privileged status, and time passes in virtue of changes in which events this ‘objective present’ highlights, and moreover this gives us evidence in favor of strong passage. Prosser argues that perception cannot be sensitive to whether the strong passage obtains, and therefore cannot represent strong passage in a way that gives us evidence of its truth. Although I accept this conclusion, I argue that Prosser’s argument for it is problematic. It threatens to over-generalize to rule out uncontroversial cases of perceptual knowledge, such as our knowledge that we live in a spatial world. Furthermore, a successful argument ruling out perceptual evidence for strong passage would have to give constraints on the theory/observation distinction of a kind not provided by Prosser’s discussion. I also comment on several other parts of the book.
Reprint years
2017, 2018
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LEEEAT-5
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-12-08
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Phenomenal Character.Shoemaker, Sydney
Colour.Gow, Laura

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-12-05

Total views
152 ( #20,099 of 42,137 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #24,324 of 42,137 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.