Formalising trade-offs beyond algorithmic fairness: lessons from ethical philosophy and welfare economics

AI and Ethics (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
There is growing concern that decision-making informed by machine learning (ML) algorithms may unfairly discriminate based on personal demographic attributes, such as race and gender. Scholars have responded by introducing numerous mathematical definitions of fairness to test the algorithm, many of which are in conflict with one another. However, these reductionist representations of fairness often bear little resemblance to real-life fairness considerations, which in practice are highly contextual. Moreover, fairness metrics tend to be implemented in narrow and targeted toolkits that are difficult to integrate into an algorithm’s broader ethical assessment. In this paper, we derive lessons from ethical philosophy and welfare economics as they relate to the contextual factors relevant for fairness. In particular we highlight the debate around acceptability of particular inequalities and the inextricable links between fairness, welfare and autonomy. We propose Key Ethics Indicators (KEIs) as a way towards providing a more holistic understanding of whether or not an algorithm is aligned to the decision-maker’s ethical values.
Categories
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LEEFTB
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-06-10
View other versions
Added to PP index
2021-06-10

Total views
3 ( #61,134 of 2,432,206 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #58,801 of 2,432,206 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.