The Identity Argument for National Self-determination

Public Affairs Quarterly 26 (2):123-139 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
A number of philosophers argue that the moral value of national identity is sufficient to justify at least a prima facie right of a national community to create its own independent, sovereign state. In the literature, this argument is commonly referred to as the identity argument. In this paper, I consider whether the identity argument successfully proves that a national group is entitled to a state of its own. To do so, I first explain three important steps in the argument and then consider whether they lead to the desired conclusion. My examination reveals that the identity argument relies on the Optimal Protection Principle; however, this principle does not apply to the case of a national community. As a result, the identity argument fails to justify even a prima facie right of a national community to establish its own state.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-10-01
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
A Defense of Abortion.Thomson, Judith Jarvis
On Nationality.Miller, David

View all 23 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
446 ( #9,185 of 48,907 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
42 ( #16,342 of 48,907 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.