Beyond enacted experiences

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Ken Wilber insists that valid knowledge must be derived from paradigms: sets of injunctions and social practices that lead to replicable experiences. In this article, I examine Wilber's claims that the theory still includes the essentials of premodern traditions, because the essentials of those traditions consist of a phenomenological core of practices leading to mystical experience. Drawing on the works of Robert Sharf and Wilhelm Halbfass and on close readings of primary texts, this article argues that mystical paradigms of replicable experience are not in fact the essentials of these traditions--neither for the majority of practitioners nor even for their revered teachers or masters. The article concludes with a discussion of the implications of this point for constructive integral work.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LELBEE
Upload history
Archival date: 2014-10-10
View other versions
Added to PP index
2013-09-23

Total views
162 ( #28,224 of 54,684 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #42,883 of 54,684 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.