Bioethics met its COVID‐19 Waterloo: The doctor knows best again

Bioethics 35 (1):3-5 (2021)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The late Robert Veatch, one of the United States’ founders of bioethics, never tired of reminding us that the paradigm-shifting contribution that bioethics made to patient care was to liberate patients out of the hands of doctors, who were traditionally seen to know best, even when they decidedly did not know best. It seems to us that with the advent of COVID-19, health policy has come full-circle on this. COVID-19 gave rise to a large number of purportedly “ethical” guidance documents aiming to assist health care providers and practitioners with responding to the ethical challenges that might arise in their response to the pandemic. Ethics has two primary functions: provide clear action guidance, and provide clear action justification. The documents in question arguably reflect the ultimate policy triumph of bioethical “principlism”, and, perhaps surprisingly, as a corollary, the ultimate triumph of “doctor-knows-best”.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LEWBMI
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-11-18
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-11-28

Total views
53 ( #55,574 of 64,254 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
25 ( #27,781 of 64,254 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.