Truthmakers and explanation

In Helen Beebee & Julian Dodd (eds.), Truthmakers: The Contemporary Debate. Clarendon Press. pp. 105--115 (2005)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Truthmaker theory promises to do some useful philosophical work: equipping us to argue against phenomenalism and Rylean behaviourism, for instance, and helping us decide what exists (Lewis 1999, 207; Armstrong 1997, 113-119). But it has proved hard to formulate a truthmaker theory that is both useful and believable. I want to suggest that a neglected approach to truthmakers – that of Ian McFetridge – can surmount some of the problems that make other theories of truthmaking unattractive. To begin with, I’ll outline some of the most prominent accounts of truthmaking in the current literature. Then the second part of the paper will explain McFetridge’s theory and argue for its superiority over these accounts.
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2011-01-18
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Truth and Objectivity.Wright, Crispin
Truth.Horwich, Paul
Truth and Objectivity.Wright, Crispin

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Nefarious Presentism.Tallant, Jonathan & Ingram, David
Presentism and Truthmaking.Caplan, Ben & Sanson, David
Truthmakers and Modality.Cameron, Ross Paul
The Hard Road to Presentism.Asay, Jamin & Baron, Sam

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
1,247 ( #1,511 of 42,942 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
146 ( #2,809 of 42,942 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.