Epistemic democracy: Generalizing the Condorcet jury theorem

Journal of Political Philosophy 9 (3):277–306 (2001)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper generalises the classical Condorcet jury theorem from majority voting over two options to plurality voting over multiple options. The paper further discusses the debate between epistemic and procedural democracy and situates its formal results in that debate. The paper finally compares a number of different social choice procedures for many-option choices in terms of their epistemic merits. An appendix explores the implications of some of the present mathematical results for the question of how probable majority cycles (as in Condorcet's paradox) are in large electorates.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LISEDG
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-08-17
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Thirteen Theorems in Search of the Truth.Grofman, Bernard; Owen, Guillermo & Feld, Scott L.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Can Real Social Epistemic Networks Deliver the Wisdom of Crowds?Sullivan, Emily; Sondag, Max; Rutter, Ignaz; Meulemans, Wouter; Cunningham, Scott; Speckmann, Bettina & Alfano, Mark

View all 87 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
324 ( #9,722 of 41,486 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
46 ( #13,409 of 41,486 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.