Overlapping Ontologies and Indigenous Knowledge. From Integration to Ontological Self-­Determination

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Current controversies about knowledge integration reflect conflicting ideas of what it means to “take Indigenous knowledge seriously”. While there is increased interest in integrating Indigenous and Western scientific knowledge in various disciplines such as anthropology and ethnobiology, integration projects are often accused of recognizing Indigenous knowledge only insofar as it is useful for Western scientists. The aim of this article is to use tools from philosophy of science to develop a model of both successful integration and integration failures. On the one hand, I argue that cross-cultural recognition of property clusters leads to an ontological overlap that makes knowledge integration often epistemically productive and socially useful. On the other hand, I argue that knowledge integration is limited by ontological divergence. Adequate models of Indigenous knowledge will therefore have to take integration failures seriously and I argue that integration efforts need to be complemented by a political notion of ontological self-determination.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LUDOOA-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-06-13
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Scientific Kinds.Ereshefsky, Marc & Reydon, Thomas A. C.

View all 23 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-06-13

Total views
338 ( #7,671 of 38,069 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
56 ( #6,690 of 38,069 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.