Justifying the Epistemological Theory of Argumentation

Informal Logic 44 (1):574-600 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article discusses Harvey Siegel’s general justification of the epistemological theory of argumentation in his seminal essay “Arguing with Arguments." On the one hand, the achievements of this essay are honoured—in particular, a thorough differentiation of the different meanings of ‘argument’ and ‘argumentation,’ the semantic justification of the fundamentality of arguments as sequences of propositions, and the detailed critiques of alternative theories of argumentation. On the other hand, suggestions for strengthening the theory are added to Siegel's expositions, which make different perspectives within the epistemological theory of argumentation recognisable.

Author's Profile

Christoph Lumer
University Of Siena

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-03-16

Downloads
105 (#87,348)

6 months
105 (#41,196)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?