The “Multirealization” of Multiple Realizability

In A. Hieke & H. Leitgeb (eds.), Reduction, Abstraction, Analysis. Ontos. pp. 79 (2009)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Multiple Realizability (MR) must still be regarded as one of the principal arguments against type reductionist accounts of higher-order properties and their special laws. Against this I argue that there is no unique MR but rather a multitude of MR categories. In a slogan: MR is itself “multi-realized”. If this is true then we cannot expect one unique reductionist strategy against MR as an anti-reductionist argument. The main task is rather to develop a taxonomy of the wide variety of MR cases and to sketch possible reductionist answers for each class of cases. The paper outlines some first steps in this direction.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LYRTMO
Revision history
Archival date: 2009-03-06
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Philosophical Investigations.Wittgenstein, Ludwig
Real Patterns.Dennett, Daniel C.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-03-07

Total views
497 ( #5,660 of 41,641 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
67 ( #8,241 of 41,641 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.