The “Multirealization” of Multiple Realizability

In A. Hieke & H. Leitgeb (eds.), Reduction, Abstraction, Analysis. Ontos. pp. 79 (2009)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Multiple Realizability (MR) must still be regarded as one of the principal arguments against type reductionist accounts of higher-order properties and their special laws. Against this I argue that there is no unique MR but rather a multitude of MR categories. In a slogan: MR is itself “multi-realized”. If this is true then we cannot expect one unique reductionist strategy against MR as an anti-reductionist argument. The main task is rather to develop a taxonomy of the wide variety of MR cases and to sketch possible reductionist answers for each class of cases. The paper outlines some first steps in this direction.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LYRTMO
Upload history
Archival date: 2009-03-06
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-03-07

Total views
756 ( #9,110 of 72,563 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #49,639 of 72,563 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.