Unrealistic assumptions and unnecessary confusions : rereading and rewriting F53 as a realist statement

In The methodology of positive economics : Reflections on the Milton Friedman legacy. Cambridge University Press (2009)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
It is argued that rather than a well defined F-Twist, Milton Friedman’s “Methodology of positive economics” offers an F-Mix: a pool of ambiguous and inconsistent ingredients that can be used for putting together a number of different methodological positions. This concerns issues such as the very concept of being unrealistic, the goal of predictive tests, the as-if formulation of theories, explanatory unification, social construction, and more. Both friends and foes of Friedman’s essay have ignored its open-ended unclarities. Their removal may help create new common ground for more focused debate in economics. Here I show how F53 can be reread/rewritten as a socially constructivist fallibilist, and realist statement – in contrast to the received instrumentalist interpretation.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-09-07
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
528 ( #9,460 of 56,960 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
112 ( #5,052 of 56,960 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.