Public Reason Can Be Reasonably Rejected

Social Theory and Practice 43 (2):343-367 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Public reason as a political ideal aims to reconcile reasonable disagreement; however, is public reason itself the object of reasonable disagreement? Jonathan Quong, David Estlund, Andrew Lister, and some other philosophers maintain that public reason is beyond reasonable disagreement. I argue this view is untenable. In addition, I consider briefly whether or not two main versions of the public reason principle, namely, the consensus version and the convergence version, need to satisfy their own requirements. My discussion has several important implications for the debate on public reason.
ISBN(s)
0037-802X
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MANPRC-3
Revision history
First archival date: 2016-09-23
Latest version: 5 (2017-03-25)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy.Williams, Bernard Arthur Owen
Justice for Hedgehogs.Dworkin, Ronald

View all 24 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-09-23

Total views
550 ( #3,852 of 38,032 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
137 ( #2,335 of 38,032 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.