Two Puzzles About Mercy

Philosophical Quarterly 63 (251):269-292 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Anslem raised a puzzle about mercy: How can anyone (God, say, or a judge) be both just and merciful at the same time? For it seemed to Anselm that justice requires giving people what they deserve, while being merciful involves treating people less harshly than they deserve. This puzzle has led to a number of analyses of mercy. But a strange thing emerges from discussions of this topic: people seem to have wildly divergent intuitions about putative cases of mercy. Examples that are taken by some to be paradigm cases of mercy are seen by others to be clear instances of non-mercy. This phenomenon gives rise to a new puzzle: Why is it that people seem to have such wildly divergent intuitions about putative examples of mercy? This paper proposes a new analysis of mercy that provides solutions to both of these puzzles about mercy
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2012-11-06
Latest version: 2 (2014-08-21)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
628 ( #9,919 of 65,767 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #30,390 of 65,767 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.