Neighborhoods and States: Why Collective Self-determination is Not Always Valuable

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Collective self-determination is considered to be an important political value. Many liberal political philosophers appeal to it to defend the right of states to exclude would-be newcomers. In this paper, I challenge the value of collective self-determination in the case of countries like the US, former colonial powers with a history of white supremacist immigration and citizenship policies. I argue for my claim by way of an analogy: There is no value to white neighborhoods in the US, which are the result of racist attitudes and state policies, determining autonomously who should become a neighbor. In light of this commitment, defenders of the US's right to exclude would need to explain why it should be of moral value that a community whose character and composition has been shaped by white supremacy be able to determine its membership on its own terms.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MENNAS-3
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-01-18
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-01-18

Total views
61 ( #51,778 of 2,445,379 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #50,961 of 2,445,379 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.