Metaethics in context of engineering ethical and moral systems

In AAAI Spring Series Technical Reports. Palo Alto, CA, USA: AAAI Press (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
It is not clear to what the projects of creating an artificial intelligence (AI) that does ethics, is moral, or makes moral judgments amounts. In this paper we discuss some of the extant metaethical theories and debates in moral philosophy by which such projects should be informed, specifically focusing on the project of creating an AI that makes moral judgments. We argue that the scope and aims of that project depend a great deal on antecedent metaethical commitments. Metaethics, therefore, plays the role of an Archimedean fulcrum in this context, very much like the Archimedean role that it is often taken to take in context of normative ethics (Dworkin 1996; Dreier 2002; Fantl 2006; Ehrenberg 2008).
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MICMIC
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-08-15
View upload history
Chapters BETA
References found in this work BETA
The Moral Problem.Smith, Michael
The Sources of Normativity.Korsgaard, Christine

View all 29 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Quantified Relationship.Danaher, John; Nyholm, Sven & Earp, Brian D.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-03-28

Total views
20 ( #40,174 of 42,272 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #37,239 of 42,272 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.