Informed Consent: What Must Be Disclosed and What Must Be Understood?

American Journal of Bioethics:1-19 (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Over the last few decades, multiple studies have examined the understanding of participants in clinical research. They show variable and often poor understanding of key elements of disclosure, such as expected risks and the experimental nature of treatments. Did the participants in these studies give valid consent? According to the standard view of informed consent they did not. The standard view holds that the recipient of consent has a duty to disclose certain information to the profferer of consent because valid consent requires that information to be understood. The contents of the understanding and disclosure requirements are therefore conceptually linked. In this paper, we argue that the standard view is mistaken. The disclosure and understanding requirements have distinct grounds tied to two different ways in which a token of consent can be rendered invalid. Analysis of these grounds allows us to derive the contents of the two requirements. It also implies that it is sometimes permissible to enroll willing participants who have not understood everything that they ought to be told about their clinical trials.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MILICW
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-02-21
View other versions
Added to PP index
2021-01-19

Total views
21 ( #55,800 of 56,906 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #34,185 of 56,906 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.