What We Think We Are: Maximizing the Subjects in the Human Sciences

Annals of Philosophy, Social and Human Disciplines 1 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Human-sciences research often focuses on social problems to create tools for solving them. Yet, in using common prejudices in gathering and sorting data on their subjects, they risk propagating those same prejudices. This article proposes that a major subject matter of human sciences is human concepts themselves. Concepts about “what we are,” individually and as a species, are deeply embedded, if not essential. It concludes that for greater precision, practitioners in human sciences must take maximum advantage of this characteristic of the subject, making individuals’ concepts about what they consider themselves to be integral criteria of data gathering and sorting.

Author's Profile

Lantz Fleming Miller
University of Twente

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-04-10

Downloads
144 (#80,383)

6 months
78 (#59,309)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?