An African perspective on the partiality and impartiality debate: Insights from Kwasi Wiredu's moral philosophy

South African Journal of Philosophy 36 (4):470-482 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this article, I attempt to bridge the gap between partiality and impartiality in moral philosophy from an oft-neglected African perspective. I draw a solution for this moral-theoretical impasse between partialists and impartialists from Kwasi Wiredu's, one of the most influential African philosophers, distinction between an ethic and ethics. I show how an ethic accommodates partiality and ethics impartiality. Wiredu's insight is that partialism is not concerned with strict moral issues.
Reprint years
3017
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MOLAAP-3
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-11-28
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-11-28

Total views
711 ( #8,299 of 65,538 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
103 ( #6,199 of 65,538 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.