Interrogating Healthy Conflict

Journal of Religious Ethics 48 (2):289-298 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The need to turn an enemy into an adversary is an ethical obligation. I try to show that this obligation has multiple religious and philosophical resources. The ethical imperative also requires us to not overstate and magnify any problem at hand to the point that it becomes insurmountable and enmity becomes an end in itself. I do ask the question whether Springs thinks of Colin Kaepernick’s peaceful protest by taking the knee at football games as an instance of healthy conflict. Are the terms peace and healthy conflict perhaps not better viewed as allegories for the interrogation of the human condition? Perhaps healthy conflict remains a series of questions rather than concrete outcomes.

Author's Profile

Ebrahim Moosa
Duke University

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-05-17

Downloads
422 (#56,314)

6 months
105 (#49,993)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?