Reply to Howard, De Nys, and Speight

The Owl of Minerva 43 (1/2):149-177 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this response I first address the criticisms of omission by discussing some of the elements of the original project that were excluded in the final version (section 1). In section 2 I respond to Howard’s criticism that I assume too much transparency in conscience. In section 3 I discuss the problem of evil and the transition in the Phenomenology of Spirit from conscience to religion. I focus here especially on the distinction between Objective and Absolute Spirit, and on how that distinction plays out differently in the Phenomenology and the Philosophy of Right. In section 4 I take up the specifically political issues of conscience, responding to Speight’s suggestion that conscience should have a transformative role and to De Nys’s query about the State’s relationship to dissenting moral and religious views. Finally, in section 5 I take up the issues of whether I and Hegel do justice to the range of uses of conscience and whether or not the Hegelian view is too optimistic about modernity
Categories
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years
2012
ISBN(s)
0030-7580
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MOYRTH
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-08-05
View other versions
Added to PP index
2013-04-04

Total views
43 ( #46,248 of 52,923 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #50,419 of 52,923 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.