Issues with the Judicial System: A Philosophical and Psychological Approach

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
What factors affect judicial decision-making? The legal system is of utmost importance because of its impact on our lives. Judges appear to have the most power among any social workers seeing as the precedents set in their decisions are tantamount to written law. Nevertheless, judges may be subject to certain biases, moral and cognitive alike, which influence their rulings. Looking into how morality and cognitive biases affect judges may also reveal how we as individuals handle combining morals with ethics- as well as whether any discrepancies among ourselves are justifiable. An investigation into relevant moral and jurisprudential theories revealed much about the inner workings of a judge’s mindset- whether he or she recognizes it or not. Coupling this with corroborated research on a select few heuristics present specifically for judges sets the foundation for an array of possible solutions in order to ensure the most impartial judicial proceedings. Plausible remedies include conducting premortems, implicit association tests, and a revised ruling procedure.
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
NAGIWT
Upload history
First archival date: 2018-09-19
Latest version: 2 (2018-09-19)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2018-09-19

Total views
316 ( #17,287 of 57,077 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
50 ( #14,825 of 57,077 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.