Representing Subjects, Mind-dependent Objects: Kant, Leibniz and the Amphiboly

British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (1):133-151 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper compares Kant’s and Leibniz’s views on the relation between knowing subjects and known objects. Kant discusses Leibniz’s philosophy in the ‘Amphiboly’ section of the first Critique. According to Kant, Leibniz’s main error is mistaking objects in space and time for mind-independent things in themselves, that is, for monads. The paper argues that, pace Kant, Leibniz regards objects in space and time as mind-dependent. A deeper divergence between the two philosophers concerns knowing subjects. For Leibniz, they are substances. For Kant, we cannot know whether they are substances. Kant conceives of knowing subjects as complex systems of cognitive capacities.

Author Profiles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-02-01

Downloads
1,547 (#9,151)

6 months
343 (#4,336)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?