Reasoning in Listening

In Frans H. van Eemeren, J. Anthony Blair, Charles A. Willard & A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans (eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. Amsterdam: Sic Sat. pp. 803-806 (2003)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Our thesis is that reasoning plays a greater—or at least a different—role in understanding oral discourse such as lectures and speeches than it does in understanding comparatively long written discourse. For example, both reading and listening involve framing hypotheses about the direction the discourse is headed. But since a reader can skip around to check and revise hypotheses, the reader’s stake in initially getting it right is not as great as the listener’s, who runs the risk of getting hopelessly lost. We also consider how representing the content of discourse and dealing with its pragmatic logic differs in reading and listening.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
OLSRIL
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-11-21
Latest version: 2 (2015-11-21)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics and Epistemology of Demonstratives and Other Indexicals.David Kaplan - 1989 - In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. Oxford University Press. pp. 481-563.
Situations and Attitudes.Cocchiarella, Nino B.; Barwise, Jon & Perry, John

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2012-11-03

Total views
235 ( #14,626 of 42,917 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
29 ( #22,038 of 42,917 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.