Situations and Dispositions: How to Rescue the Military Virtues from Social Psychology

Journal of Military Ethics 16 (1-2):78-93 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In recent years, it has been argued more than once that situations determine our conduct to a much greater extent than our character does. This argument rests on the findings of social psychologists such as Stanley Milgram, who have popularized the idea that we can all be brought to harm innocent others. An increasing number of philosophers and ethicists make use of such findings, and some of them have argued that this so-called situationist challenge fatally undermines virtue ethics. As virtue ethics is currently the most popular underpinning for ethics education in the military, it is important to know to what extent the claim situationists make is correct. Fortunately, a closer look indicates that an interactionist perspective, with our character and the situation interplaying, is more accurate than the situationist perspective.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years
2017
PhilPapers/Archive ID
OLSSAD
Upload history
First archival date: 2018-01-17
Latest version: 2 (2018-04-10)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-08-10

Total views
286 ( #22,608 of 2,449,090 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #50,852 of 2,449,090 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.