What Constitutes a Formal Analogy?

In Hans V. Hansen, Christopher W. Tindale, J. Anthony Blair, Ralph H. Johnson & Robert C. Pinto (eds.), Argumentation and its Applications [CD-ROM]. Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation. pp. 1-8 (2002)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
There is ample justification for having analogical material in standardized tests for graduate school admission, perhaps especially for law school. We think that formal-analogy questions should compare different scenarios whose structure is the same in terms of the number of objects and the formal properties of their relations. The paper deals with this narrower question of how legitimately to have formal analogy test items, and the broader question of what constitutes a formal analogy in general.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Valid Reasoning by Analogy.Weitzenfeld, Julian S.
The Logic Of Analogy.Sacksteder, William

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
241 ( #13,449 of 41,636 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #22,184 of 41,636 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.