What Constitutes a Formal Analogy?

In Hans V. Hansen, Christopher W. Tindale, J. Anthony Blair, Ralph H. Johnson & Robert C. Pinto (eds.), Argumentation and its Applications [CD-ROM]. Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation. pp. 1-8 (2002)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
There is ample justification for having analogical material in standardized tests for graduate school admission, perhaps especially for law school. We think that formal-analogy questions should compare different scenarios whose structure is the same in terms of the number of objects and the formal properties of their relations. The paper deals with this narrower question of how legitimately to have formal analogy test items, and the broader question of what constitutes a formal analogy in general.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
OLSWCA
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View other versions
Added to PP index
2012-10-31

Total views
304 ( #16,216 of 53,645 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #28,087 of 53,645 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.