Distinguishing WV Quine and Donald Davidson

Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 1 (1):1-22 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Given W.V. Quine’s and Donald Davidson’s extensive agreement about much of the philosophy of language and mind, and the obvious methodological parallels between Quine’s radical translation and Davidson’s radical interpretation, many—including Quine and Davidson—are puzzled by their occasional disagreements. I argue for the importance of attending to these disagreements, not just because doing so deepens our understanding of these influential thinkers, but because they are in fact the shadows thrown from two distinct conceptions of philosophical inquiry: Quine’s “naturalism” and what I call Davidson’s “humanism.” The clash between Quine and Davidson thus provides valuable insight into the history of analytic naturalism and its malcontents.

Author's Profile

James Pearson
Bridgewater State University

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-07-17

Downloads
362 (#62,316)

6 months
66 (#80,811)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?