Evidentialism, Knowledge, and Evidence Possession

Logos and Episteme 9 (4):433-449 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Evidentialism has shown itself to be an important research program in contemporary epistemology, with evidentialists giving theories of virtually every important topic in epistemology. Nevertheless, at the heart of evidentialism is a handful of concepts, namely evidence, evidence possession, and evidential fit. If evidentialists cannot give us a plausible account of these concepts, then their research program, with all its various theories, will be in serious trouble. In this paper, I argue that evidentialists has yet to give a plausible account of evidence possession and the prospects for doing so are dim.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
2069-0533
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PEREKA
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-01-03
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Against Gullibility.Fricker, Elizabeth
Evidentialism.Feldman, Richard & Conee, Earl

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-12-28

Total views
135 ( #23,336 of 43,752 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
66 ( #9,895 of 43,752 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.