God, Elvish, and Secondary Creation

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
According to the theological worldview of J. R. R. Tolkien, the principal work of a Christian is to know, love, and serve God. Why, then, did he devote so much time to creating an entire family of imaginary languages for imaginary peoples in an imaginary world? This paper argues that the stories of these peoples, with their ‘eucatastrophes,’ have consoling value amid the incomplete stories of our own lives. But more fundamentally, secondary creation is proper to the adopted children of God and can be a way of drawing closer to God. Such work also witnesses to the freedom of the children of God, not only to receive salvation from God, but to contribute to the enrichment of creation and eternal life.
No keywords specified (fix it)
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-07-08
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Joint Attention: Communication and Other Minds: Issues in Philosophy and Psychology.Eilan, Naomi; Hoerl, Christoph; McCormack, Teresa & Roessler, Johannes (eds.)

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
16 ( #39,358 of 40,725 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #28,253 of 40,725 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.