Making Philosophy of Science More Socially Relevant Vol. 177

Springer (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This special issue advances arguments for an examples of socially relevant and socially engaged philosophy of science. The introduction (Fehr & Plaisance) provides an argument for a more socially relevant philosophy of science (SRPOS). Their aims are to characterize this body of work in philosophy of science, to argue for its importance, and to demonstrate that there are significant opportunities for philosophy of science to engage with and support this type of research. The impetus of this project was a keen sense of missed opportunities for philosophy of science to have a broader social impact. Fehr & Plaisance illustrate various ways in which SRPOS can provide social benefits, as well as benefits to scientific practice and philosophy itself. Also, SRPOS is consistent with some historical and contemporary goals of philosophy of science. They call for an expansion of philosophy of science to include more of this type of work. In order to support this expansion, they characterize philosophy of science as an epistemic community and examine the culture and practices of philosophy of science that can help or hinder research in this area.

Author Profiles

Kathryn Plaisance
University of Waterloo
Carla Fehr
University of Waterloo

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-08-21

Downloads
35 (#102,008)

6 months
32 (#99,605)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?