Two Epistemic Issues for a Narrative Argument Structure

In Steve Oswald & Didier Maillat (eds.), Argumentation and Inference. Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation, Fribourg 2017, Vol. I. London, UK: College Publcations. pp. 519-526 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The transcendental approach to understanding narrative argument derives from the idea that for any believable fictional narrative, we can ask—what principles or generalizations would have to be true of human nature in order for the narrative to be believable? I address two key issues: whether only realistic or realist fictional narratives are believable, and how could it be established that we have an intuitive, mostly veridical grasp of human nature that grounds believability?
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2018-09-01
Latest version: 2 (2020-12-17)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
155 ( #36,585 of 64,109 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #40,326 of 64,109 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.