A New Reading of Aritsotle's "Hyle"

Modern Schoolman 68 (3):225-244 (1991)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Aritsotle's hyle is contrasted with Plato's chora and Aquinas's prima materia. It is argued that Plato and Aristotle developed their concepts in response to very different needs, and that Aquinas's theory reflects a conflation of their views by Neoplatonic commentators. Hyle is shown to be an active potential to a determinate form in contrast to Aquinas's prima materia, which is a purely indeterminate passive potential. This gives a point of attachment in Aristotle's philosophy of nature for the later notion of universal laws of nature.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-07-25
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
329 ( #17,752 of 2,427,498 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
42 ( #18,729 of 2,427,498 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.