Merleau-Ponty and Embodied Cognitive Science

Discipline Filosofiche 24 (2):67-90 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
What would the Merleau-Ponty of Phenomenology of Perception have thought of the use of his phenomenology in the cognitive sciences? This question raises the issue of Merleau-Ponty’s conception of the relationship between the sciences and philosophy, and of what he took the philosophical significance of his phenomenology to be. In this article I suggest an answer to this question through a discussion of certain claims made in connection to the “post-cognitivist” approach to cognitive science by Hubert Dreyfus, Shaun Gallagher and Francisco Varela, Evan Thompson and Eleanor Rosch. I suggest that these claims are indicative of an appropriation of Merleau-Ponty’s thought that he would have welcomed as innovative science. Despite this, I argue that he would have viewed this use of his work as potentially occluding the full philosophical significance that he believed his phenomenological investigations to contain.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
POLMAE-3
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-11-21
Latest version: 2 (2015-12-08)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Phenomenological Mind.Gallagher, Shaun & Zahavi, Dan
The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience.Varela, Francisco; Thompson, Evan & Rosch, Eleanor
The Structure of Behavior.Merleau-Ponty, Maurice

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-10-25

Total views
1,565 ( #1,049 of 42,199 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
413 ( #780 of 42,199 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.