Embedding irony and the semantics/pragmatics distinction

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper argues that we need to re-think the semantics/pragmatics distinction in the light of new evidence from embedding of irony. This raises a new version of the old problem of ‘embedded implicatures’. I argue that embedded irony isn’t fully explained by solutions proposed for other embedded implicatures. I first consider two strategies: weak pragmatics and strong pragmatics. These explain embedded irony as truth-conditional content. However, by trying to shoehorn irony into said-content, they raise problems of their own. I conclude by considering how a modified Gricean model can explain that irony embeds qua implicature. This leads us to prefer a local implicature model. This has important consequences for how we draw the semantics/pragmatics distinction.
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
POPEIA-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-03-02
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Literal Meaning.Recanati, François

View all 50 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-03-02

Total views
242 ( #14,927 of 43,910 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
92 ( #5,767 of 43,910 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.