On What There 'Is': Aristotle and the Aztecs on Being and Existence

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
A curious feature of Aztec philosophy is that the basic metaphysical question of the “Western” tradition cannot be formulated in their language, in Nahuatl. This did not, however, prevent the Aztecs from developing an account of 'reality', or whatever it is that might exist. The article is the first of its kind to compare the work of Aristotle on ousia (being) and the Aztecs on teotl and ometeotl. Through this analysis, it suggests that both of the Nahuatl terms are fundamental for expressing the basic character of reality as process for the Aztecs. It also defends their notion as prima facia reasonable, despite its wide divergence from Aristotle's view.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PUROWT
Revision history
Archival date: 2020-04-20
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2020-04-20

Total views
36 ( #45,439 of 50,281 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
36 ( #17,039 of 50,281 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.