The Double Nature of DNA: Reevaluating the Common Heritage Idea

Journal of Political Philosophy 24 (1):47-66 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
DNA possesses a double nature: it is both an analog chemical compound and a digital carrier of information. By distinguishing these two aspects, this paper aims to reevaluate the legally and politically influential idea that the human genome forms part of the common heritage of mankind, an idea which is thought to conflict with the practice of patenting DNA. The paper explores the lines of reasoning that lead to the common heritage idea, articulates and motivates what emerges as the most viable version of it, and assesses the extent to which this version conflicts with gene-patenting practices as exemplified by the U.S. regime. It concludes that the genome is best thought of as a repository of information to which humanity has a fiduciary relationship, and that on this view, the perceived conflict with gene-patenting largely dissolves.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
QUETDN
Revision history
First archival date: 2017-01-26
Latest version: 3 (2017-11-10)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-08-01

Total views
162 ( #15,984 of 38,055 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
74 ( #4,818 of 38,055 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.