Nous and Aisthēsis: Two Cognitive Faculties in Aristotle

Méthexis:103-120 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In disagreement with Claudia Baracchi’s controversial thesis that there is a “simultaneity and indissolubility” if not an “identity” of intelligence (nous) and perception (aisthēsis) at the core of Aristotle’s philosophy, I will argue that Aristotle maintains a fundamental distinction between these cognitive faculties. My goal in this paper is to examine specific parts of two central and complex passages, VI.8, 1142a12-30 and VI.11, 1143a33-b15, from the Nicomachean Ethics to show that Baracchi’s view is unpersuasive. I will show that Aristotle considers nous to be a different capacity than mere perception and one through which particulars and indemonstrable principles become intelligible. Moreover, I will show that Aristotle considers that the objects of nous differ in kind from those that sensation (our senses) and perception (inference from our senses) grasp. After examining critically Baracchi’s thesis in light of a close reading of those two relevant passages, I will conclude the paper by showing the significance of Aristotle’s claim that a state is defined in terms of its objects of apprehension for understanding the distinction between nous and aisthēsis.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-11-07
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics.Rowe, Christopher & Broadie, Sarah

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
202 ( #20,942 of 48,991 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
68 ( #8,901 of 48,991 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.