Toward a Critical Theory of Harm: Ableism, Normativity, and Transability (On Body Integrity Identity Disorder)
APA Newsletter on Philosophy and Medicine 16 (1):37-45 (2016)
Abstract
Body Integrity Identity Disorder (BIID) is a very rare
condition describing those with an intense desire or need
to move from a state of ability to relative impairment,
typically through the amputation of one or more limbs.
In this paper, I draw upon research in critical disability
studies and philosophy of disability to critique arguments
based upon the principle of nonmaleficence against such
surgery. I demonstrate how the action-relative concept of
harm in such arguments relies upon suspect notions of
biological and statistical normality, and I contend that each
fail to provide normative guidance. I then propose a critical
theory of harm, one marked by substantive engagement
with both empirical and reflective inquiry across the
sciences, social sciences, and humanities. I conclude by
discussing the implications of this theory and how
it might enrich ongoing debates in bioethics, philosophy of
disability, and the health humanities more broadly.
Keywords
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
REYTAC-4
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-11-27
View other versions
View other versions
Added to PP index
2016-11-27
Total views
931 ( #6,248 of 69,061 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
56 ( #14,165 of 69,061 )
2016-11-27
Total views
931 ( #6,248 of 69,061 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
56 ( #14,165 of 69,061 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.