Axiarchism and Selectors

Faith and Philosophy 31 (4):412-421 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This essay offers a defense of Axiarchism's answer to the question, "Why does the world exit?" against prominent objections leveled against it by Derek Parfit. Parfit rejects the Axiarchist answer while abstracting from it his own Selector strategy. I argue that the abstraction fails, and that even if we were to regard Axiarchism as an instance of a Selector hypothesis, we should regard it as the only viable one. I also argue that Parfit's abstraction leads him to mistake the nature and, thereby, the force of Axiarchism's claim to being an ultimate explanation. Finally, I defend the Axiarchist's claim that the good could not fail to rule.
Keywords
Reprint years
2014
ISBN(s)
0739-7046
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ROBAAS-3
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
What God Might Be.Leslie, John

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2014-07-25

Total views
292 ( #15,405 of 50,287 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
44 ( #13,614 of 50,287 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.