Axiarchism and Selectors

Faith and Philosophy 31 (4):412-421 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This essay offers a defense of Axiarchism's answer to the question, "Why does the world exit?" against prominent objections leveled against it by Derek Parfit. Parfit rejects the Axiarchist answer while abstracting from it his own Selector strategy. I argue that the abstraction fails, and that even if we were to regard Axiarchism as an instance of a Selector hypothesis, we should regard it as the only viable one. I also argue that Parfit's abstraction leads him to mistake the nature and, thereby, the force of Axiarchism's claim to being an ultimate explanation. Finally, I defend the Axiarchist's claim that the good could not fail to rule.
Keywords
Reprint years
2014
ISBN(s)
0739-7046
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ROBAAS-3
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View other versions
Added to PP index
2014-07-25

Total views
380 ( #14,227 of 57,106 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
67 ( #10,139 of 57,106 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.