Suspension of a Conflict in a Darkened Son

Diakrisis 1 (3):19-37 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Antithetical desires displayed throughout Kierkegaard’s authorship indicate the disjunctive assumption that the individual exists either in a state of increasing autonomy, expressed negatively as striving for freedom from divine constraint, or in a state of self-annihilating submission, expressed positively in terms of kenotic unification. Proximity to the divine thereby entails forfeiture of individuality, contrary to the explicit aim of Kierkegaard’s authorial project, and aversion to materiality. This essay enunciates the conflict (I), traces the crescendo of loss that births the pseudonymous authorship and ends in realized longing for death (II), and approaches a more holistic vision of psycho-spiritual development (III).
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ROGSOA
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-06-30
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-06-30

Total views
20 ( #49,762 of 51,218 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #27,632 of 51,218 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.