Justification and the Uniqueness Thesis Again
Logos and Episteme 7 (1):95-100 (2016)
Abstract
I reinforce my defense of permissivism about the rationality of doxastic attitudes on the face of a certain body of evidence against criticism published in this journal by Anantharaman. After making some conceptual clarifications, I manage to show that at least one of my original arguments pro-permissivism is left unscathed by Anantharaman's points.ISBN(s)
2069-0533
DOI
10.5840/logos-episteme2016718
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-04-02
Downloads
338 (#26,691)
6 months
75 (#13,794)
2016-04-02
Downloads
338 (#26,691)
6 months
75 (#13,794)
Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?