Responses to Ryan, Fosl and Gautier: SKEPSIS Book Symposium on 'Recasting Hume and Early Modern Philosophy', by Paul Russell

Skepsis: A Journal for Philosophy and Interdisciplinary Research 14 (26):121-139 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the replies to my critics that follow I offer a more detailed account of the specific papers that they discuss or examine. The papers that they are especially concerned with are: “The Material World and Natural Religion in Hume’s Treatise” (Ryan) [Essay 3], “Hume’s Skepticism and the Problem of Atheism” (Fosl) [Essay 12], and “Hume’s Philosophy of Irreligion and the Myth of British Empiricism (Gautier) [Essay 16]

Author's Profile

Paul Russell
Lund University

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-07-27

Downloads
177 (#67,593)

6 months
146 (#17,409)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?