Mathematics and Explanatory Generality: Nothing but Cognitive Salience

Erkenntnis 86 (5):1119-1137 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We demonstrate how real progress can be made in the debate surrounding the enhanced indispensability argument. Drawing on a counterfactual theory of explanation, well-motivated independently of the debate, we provide a novel analysis of ‘explanatory generality’ and how mathematics is involved in its procurement. On our analysis, mathematics’ sole explanatory contribution to the procurement of explanatory generality is to make counterfactual information about physical dependencies easier to grasp and reason with for creatures like us. This gives precise content to key intuitions traded in the debate, regarding mathematics’ procurement of explanatory generality, and adjudicates unambiguously in favour of the nominalist, at least as far as explanatory generality is concerned.

Author Profiles

Robert Knowles
Swansea University
Juha Saatsi
University of Leeds

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-07-24

Downloads
1,104 (#11,531)

6 months
142 (#25,874)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?