The disunity of moral judgment: Evidence and implications

Philosophical Psychology 1:1-20 (2022)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
We argue that there is significant evidence for reconsidering the possibility that moral judgment constitutes a distinctive category of judgment. We begin by reviewing evidence and arguments from neuroscience and philosophy that seem to indicate that a diversity of brain processes result in verdicts that we ordinarily consider “moral judgments”. We argue that if these findings are correct, this is plausible reason for doubting that all moral judgments necessarily share common features: if diverse brain processes give rise to what we refer to as “moral judgments”, then we have reason to suspect that these judgments may have different features. After advancing this argument, we show that giving up the unity of moral judgment seems to effectively dissolve the internalism/externalism debate concerning motivation within the field of metaethics.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SACTDO-4
Upload history
Archival date: 2022-03-31
View other versions
Added to PP
2022-03-31

Downloads
130 (#47,608)

6 months
130 (#4,595)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?