On Rudimentarity, Primitive Recursivity and Representability

Reports on Mathematical Logic 55:73–85 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is quite well-known from Kurt G¨odel’s (1931) ground-breaking Incompleteness Theorem that rudimentary relations (i.e., those definable by bounded formulae) are primitive recursive, and that primitive recursive functions are representable in sufficiently strong arithmetical theories. It is also known, though perhaps not as well-known as the former one, that some primitive recursive relations are not rudimentary. We present a simple and elementary proof of this fact in the first part of the paper. In the second part, we review some possible notions of representability of functions studied in the literature, and give a new proof of the equivalence of the weak representability with the (strong) representability of functions in sufficiently strong arithmetical theories.

Author's Profile

Saeed Salehi
University of Tabriz

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-02-21

Downloads
282 (#74,765)

6 months
72 (#75,737)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?