Quantum psychoid freewill ? Excerpt by.

Milano MI, Italia: By: T. Cantalupi, D. Santarcangelo, Psiche e Realtà - Tecniche Nuove (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
What we've considered so far about the epistemology of human sciences comes up again as to the concept of "destiny''and human free will: who "must" tell us if we are destined or not? Either Neuroscientists or sociologists? Either Philosophers or biochemists? Has psychology anything to say? Do we need a pool to gather them all? Many other questions come up: what determines us and how much? ls there any sense in talking about destiny? We are a complex system and our conscience is an epiphenomenon of a unitary hierarchical system: would this exclude any possibility of choice? And what does "free choice" mean? And what about the consequences on the ethics? Being Jung and Pauli’s thought a reference point, might we outline a comprehensive reading as regards such problems, even thinking of a sort of quantum psychoid free will?
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SANQPL
Upload history
First archival date: 2020-05-13
Latest version: 4 (2020-05-26)
View other versions
Added to PP
2020-05-13

Downloads
100 (#53,763)

6 months
21 (#39,748)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?