Do Filial Values Corrupt? How Can We Know? Clarifying and Assessing the Recent Confucian Debate

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In a number of papers, Liu Qingping has critiqued Confucianism’s commitment to “consanguineous affection” or filial values, claiming it to be excessive and indefensible. Many have taken issue with his textual readings and interpretive claims, but these responses do little to undermine the force of his central claim that filial values cause widespread corruption in Chinese society. This is not an interpretive claim but an empirical one. If true, it merits serious consideration. But is it true? How can we know? I survey the empirical evidence and argue that there is no stable or direct relationship between filial values and corruption. Instead, other cultural dimensions are more robust predictors of corruption. As it happens, China ranks very high in these other cultural dimensions. I conclude that if the empirical research is correct then Liu’s claims lack support.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SARDFV
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-05-20
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 28 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-05-20

Total views
186 ( #22,801 of 50,117 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
88 ( #5,842 of 50,117 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.