Perceptual Content Defended

Noûs 45 (4):714 - 750 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Recently, the thesis that experience is fundamentally a matter of representing the world as being a certain way has been questioned by austere relationalists. I defend this thesis by developing a view of perceptual content that avoids their objections. I will argue that on a relational understanding of perceptual content, the fundamental insights of austere relationalism do not compete with perceptual experience being representational. As it will show that most objections to the thesis that experience has content apply only to accounts of perceptual content on which perceptual relations to the world play no explanatory role. With austere relationalists, I will argue that perceptual experience is fundamentally relational. But against austere relationalists, I will argue that it is fundamentally both relational and representational
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SCHPCD
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-11-21
Latest version: 3 (2015-11-21)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Mind and World.McDowell, John

View all 51 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Perceptual Particularity.Schellenberg, Susanna
Introduction: Perception Without Representation.Wilson, Keith & Locatelli, Roberta
Experience and Evidence.Schellenberg, Susanna

View all 58 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-09-21

Total views
2,665 ( #413 of 40,652 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
218 ( #1,649 of 40,652 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.