Response to Churchland

Philo 13 (2):201-207 (2010)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Paul Churchland argues that Plantinga’s evolutionary argument against naturalism is unsuccessful and so we need not accept its conclusion. In this paper, we respond to Churchland’s argument. After we briefly recapitulate Plantinga’s argument and state Churchland’s argument, we offer three objections to Churchland’s argument: (1) its first premise has little to recommend it, (2) its second premise is false, and (3) its conclusion is consistent with, and indeed entails, the conclusion of Plantinga’s argument
Categories
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
1098-3570
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SEGRTC
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-11-25
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2012-09-18

Total views
168 ( #17,163 of 39,912 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #28,764 of 39,912 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.