Stanislaw Lem vs. Andrei Tarkovsky

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Tarkovsky recognizes these differences, saying that there is a contradiction with Lem's initial idea, because he was interested in the problems of inner life, spiritual problems, so to speak, and Lem was interested in the collision between man and Cosmos. In an ontological sense of the word, in the sense of the problem of knowing and the limits of this knowledge - it is about that. Lem even said that mankind was in danger, that there was a crisis of knowledge when man did not feels ... This crisis is growing, a snowball, takes the form of various human tragedies, including scientists.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SFESLV
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-01-25
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-01-25

Total views
80 ( #51,088 of 65,649 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #33,192 of 65,649 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.